SERVICES PROVIDED BY ATTORNEYS ARBITRATION SERVICES, INC.

Our panelists have an average of thirty-five years of practice so they have the ability to closely approximate the value of a claim.

They have years of experience, representing both Plaintiffs and Defendants, in all areas of civil litigation; medical and legal malpractice, domestic relations, personal injury, product liability, contract and employment law, etc.

Our panel members, as you will note, are all attorneys, seasoned litigators, and experienced in various areas of the law, and they are available to assist both Plaintiffs and Defendants in resolving disputes. The procedure used is direct, simple, and inexpensive, without any routine administrative costs or filing fees.

Let’s work together to help clients resolve disputes.

If you have any questions, call us to schedule a mediation, arbitration, or neutral case evaluation.

Below is a brief explanation of the differences between mediation, arbitration, and neutral case evaluation:

MEDIATION In mediation, the mediator assists the parties in reaching a settlement of the dispute. Mediation is an effective way for parties to control the dispute process and achieve a mutually satisfactory resolution because: The parties maintain control of the process, it allows the parties to maintain their relationship after the dispute is resolved, it guarantees confidentiality, and, it is cost effective

 

ARBITRATION In arbitration, the arbitrator receives the evidence by way of testimony, documents, medical records, etc., and decides the issues of liability and/or damages. An alternative to litigation, it is fast and inexpensive with a reasonable solution by an experienced arbitrator.

 

NEUTRAL CASE EVALUATION One or more persons assess the value of a claim and provide an appraisal of the merits, negatives, etc. before a demand letter is sent or litigation initiated; and/or evaluate the merits of the defenses and value of the claim before an offer is made or decision to go to trial.

 

FOCUS GROUPS A panel member and a small local representative group, acting like a jury, meet with a party and counsel and consider evidence, presented orally and/or by documents. Afterwards, the panel member leads the interaction among the group and counsel and discusses the positive and negative aspects of the case. Counsel and the client can then objectively evaluate their claims or defenses, and/or tailor their future presentation to maximize jury appeal.